Another Path in Iran - Sir David Amess MP
By David Amess
All of this political action and commentary
raises a very basic question about the current state of Iranian-Western
relations: What is the motivation behind this policy of appeasement on the
nuclear deal and its implementation?
Perhaps the simplest answer is that
policymakers actually believe the deal will stall Iran's progress toward a
nuclear weapon. Yet that belief seems highly dubious, since much of the recent
criticism has emphasized a lack of transparency in International Atomic Energy
Agency inspections and ongoing uncertainty of Iran's baseline nuclear
knowledge. Yet what is more important is that even if the nuclear issue has
been resolved foras much as 10 years, as its advocates
tend to claim, that does not change the fact that Iran's behavior in other
areas has gotten worse to compensate.
This has been demonstrated by the escalating
rate of executions in the Islamic Republic, along with the recent spate of
arrests of artists, writers and dual-nationals, and by Tehran's persistent
refusal to compromise over support of Syrian dictator Bashar Assad, or to limit
the Revolutionary Guards and the Iranian paramilitary role in conflict areas
like Yemen and Iraq.
These
factors and many others, which were all highlighted in the speech of the
National Council of Resistance of Iran President-elect Maryam
Rajavi at the July 9 rally, rule out the rationale
behind the nuclear agreement. It cannot be true that the Obama administration
and its allies actually believe in the moderation narrative they put forward as
justification for the
nuclear agreement.
In my opinion: The
Iranian regime's top export has always been terrorism, it is an integral part
of its ideology! And
this regime the main cause of
instability in the Middle East and world.
Comments
Post a Comment