TheIranian Election is drawing ever closer and people all over the globe are
speculating what change this will bring for relations with the middle-eastern
country, but they are wrong to expect any change from the Iranian Regime.
Heshmat
Alavi, a human rights expert, wrote an op-ed on Al-Arabiya in which he asserted that this
election would bring no significant changes for the middle-east, the
international community and, most importantly, no changes for the people of
Iran.
He
wrote: “Iran’s presidential election is nothing but a game we witness every
four years. The president has no true role in running the country, other than
to implement the supreme leader’s policies. [Ali] Khamenei, the Supreme Leader,
has the final say on all national security and foreign policy issues, while
enjoying full, unrivalled supremacy.”
The
two main presidential candidates are incumbent
President Hassan Rouhani and hardline
cleric Ebrahim Raisi. Despite being labelled a moderate, Rouhani has
overseen more than 3,000 executions in his four-year tenure, mainly for
low-level, non-violent offenders, while Raisi was on the infamous Death
Commission who sent 30,000 political prisoners, mainly members of the Iranian
opposition People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), to their death in 1988.
There
is a false narrative of moderates and hardliners within the Iranian Regime, in
which the West is encouraged to support the moderate candidate because they
fear what a hardliner would do. Truthfully, although there is a severe power
struggle in Iran, those men are fighting for money and power; not for the good
of ordinary Iranians or for better relationships with the rest of the world.
Alavi
wrote: “Khamenei even has the authority, under the regime’s so-called
constitution, to veto and dismiss all powers provided to the president. The
difference we will witness in Iran’s approach to domestic and international
affairs will be zero.”
With
this in mind, he urged the US Congress to designate Iran’s Revolutionary Guards
Corps (IRGC),
as a foreign terrorist organisation now. There would be no use, in his mind, in
waiting to see if the IRGC would stop funding terrorism under a new President
because they would not. They should be blacklisted now, for the crimes they
have already committed in order to cut off their funding.
He
reiterated that by not blacklisting the IRGC, the US is breaking its own
sanctions. The Quds force, the IRGC unit in charge of global operations, was
designated a terror organisation in 2007 and the IRGC funds them, as it does
many other terrorist groups like Hezbollah, which was blacklisted by the US in
1997.
Comments
Post a Comment