Monday, 3
April 2017
It appears the recent Arab League
Summit in Jordan should be considered an important development in the path of
further isolating Iran in the Middle East. At a first glance, this was a
conference in which the highest number of state leaders participated in
comparison to previous such gatherings.
A more in-depth perspective places us before this
important conclusion that most speakers strongly criticized Iran’s meddling and
highlighted the necessity of solidarity and alliance amongst Arab states to
confront this phenomenon. Leaders of Saudi Arabia and Jordan specifically
expressed their grave concerns over Iran’s interference across the region, especially Syria,
sectarian warmongering and Tehran’s state sponsorship of terrorism.
“Tehran
provokes sectarianism and hinders efforts to resolve regional crises,” said
Arab League Secretary General Ahmed Aboul Gheit.
Iran’s setback
Significant
is the fact that the Arab Summit initially prepared a relatively low-profile
draft resolution adopting a soft tone in relation to Iran. However, the final
resolution prepared and published by Arab League Foreign Ministers reflected
the majority members’ position, being completely against Iran and the mullahs’
policies of meddling and supporting terrorism.
However, a few Arab countries such as Iraq and Lebanon – literally taken hostage
by Iran – or Algeria, enjoying specific interests in its relations with the
mullahs’ regime, could not jump on this resolution train.
This left
the remaining member states before two options: either refusing to sign,
forgoing any possibility of forming a consensus and accepting resulting rifts;
or financing on their common grounds, being the subjects of Palestine and
opposing any meddling in others internal affairs (without specifically
mentioning Iran). Although the terms used in the resolution falls of short of
directly pinpointing the mullahs’ regime in Iran, it is quite obvious who the
crosshairs were placed on.
Importantly, of grave significance for the main member
states in this conference was to enjoy Iraq’s signature, and that of its Prime
Minister, on this initiative. Considering the new international status quo and
Washington’s new policies, the gradual distancing of Iraq from Iran, and further advances in this regard is seen in the
forecast.
Although the terms used in the Arab
Summit resolution falls of short of directly pinpointing the regime in Iran, it
is quite obvious who the crosshairs were placed on. (Reuters)
A new era
It is worth noting the Obama years rendered a complete
passive and inactive American policy in regards to Iraq. Through a disastrous
strategic mistake in pulling out prematurely from Iraq, Washington practically
giftwrapped Baghdad to Tehran.
This policy has currently changed and American policymakers have made it
crystal clear how they will not permit Iran take on any wished measures.
US CENTCOM commander General Joseph Votel in a recent hearing of the House of
Representatives Armed Forces Committee emphasized on the necessity to
confront Iran as the main long-term threat before stability in the Middle East.
Votel also went the distance to insist on considering military assets and other
capabilities to stop this regime.
Iraqi
Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi recently visited Washington and signs indicate
he has been briefed and received specific instructions over the America’s major
policy overhaul and shifts in relation to Iraq and the entire Middle East. To
this end, Arab leaders saw it very important to have Iraq – a party voting
against previous summit resolutions – to sign this new initiative. This allowed
the summit to maintain its fabric and unity over two main subjects of Palestine
and condemning meddling in the internal affairs of other countries.
General
James Jones, former NATO commander and US national security advisor, recently
called on all Gulf States to establish a defensive alliance similar to that of
NATO against the threats Iran poses for regional states. Such an “Arab NATO”
will enjoy America’s support, he added.
Global front against Iran
When we use the terms a substantial alteration in
international politics, we must mention a recent hearing held at the British
Parliament discussing Iran’s meddling in the region, widespread condemnations
targeting the mullahs’ human rights violations,
calls to establish an Arab alliance aimed at evict this regime from regional
countries. For such a cause, designating the Revolutionary Guards as a foreign terrorist organization
would be a prelude measure and act as a necessary springboard.
This goes in line with further measures to enforce the
flawed deal aimed at curbing Iran’s nuclear program.
Rest assured if the Arab World adopts a firm stance and demands Iran’s eviction
from their soil, the US will most definitely be encouraged to blacklist the
IRGC and defang Iran’s meddling.
Moreover,
the presence of United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, Organization
of Islamic Cooperation Secretary-General Youssef bin al-Ottaimeen, European
Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini, envoys of the US And France in
this conference indicated the decisions made in this platform enjoy enormous
international support, rendering further worldwide isolation for Tehran.
Reactions
seen from Iran prove the fact this Arab Summit in Jordan ended as a complete
failure and delivered heavy damages to Tehran’s interests. As usual, the
mullahs’ media resort to low-standard lies that deserve no repetition. The
mullahs, however, cannot cloak their utter anger and fear of such a united
position against its meddling in Arab countries.
As we close in to Iran’s presidential
elections in May,
rest assured this isolation on the international stage will have a major impact
on Iran’s domestic politics, and the Iranian society – described as a powder keg – is
watching very closely.
Comments
Post a Comment